| 
The concept of judging intolerance is not, in any way, similar to the judgement one may make towards homosexuals. Homosexuals are not scientifically proven to be a harm to those around them, hence to judge them as morally wrong has no basis. It is intolerance without any real justification. Whereas the concept of murder, and also Christian intolerance, are both characteristics within individuals that affect other individuals that may not want to be affected. This creates a very distinct divergence between different moral beliefs. Some affect others in negative ways when they may not want to be affected, and others protect the individual liberties and rights of individuals. For Christianity to state, openly, that homosexuals are sinful, and in the old testament that they should be put to death, clearly places Christianity in the similar realm of Nazism. It is a stereotype that is in no way statistically or scientifically proven, and is placed on individuals who have little say in being a part of the group they are being stereotyped for. If you can, in any way, logically and statistically prove to me that there is somehow a large difference between the way Nazis regarded gays and the way Christians regard gays, i'd be all ears. The very fact that there is very little difference between the two is frightening, for Nazis punished gays for being gay in the exact same manner that they punished Jews. This means that Christianity has the potential to support conduct that could very well result in mass killing. Hence, if a Christian wishes to seperate their intolerent and illogical beliefs about gays from those of Nazis, they must accept gays and their unplanned choice of lifestyle. if they do not, they are no different than nazis, and therefore have the same capabilitied as them. Which is a moot point since Christians have murdered more innocents under the guise of moral conduct than Nazis since the advent of the religion.
"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."
|