Science is prooving the Bible

Hmm . . . I guess I never learned such things?
Ya, science & religion ( that is to say the bible or biblical version). Jesus first miracle, turning water into wine?
http://www.captaincynic.com/thread.php3/thrdid=30909-u-frmid=21#30976> While in theory? i guess water could disassociate into an acid (+H) & base (-OH) [not probable]
or acohol groub but wine is indicative of the presences of aromatic hydrocarbons in the formulation?
Edit: what a nasty thought as I linked to another page ' did i get it right? (H2O) <=> (+H) + (-OH) => (-H) + (+OH), http://www.fortunecity.com/emachines/e11/86/randreal.html#Einstein scarey stuff. Happy Hallo!

"Terrorist or tyrant, few may come to the Truth that both are poor choice."
[  Edited by cturtle at   ]

You're completely impossible to understand man.

"Durch Nacht und Blut das Licht"

l

"as i see it the only "variable" in the equation is THOUGHT. you are capable of changing this and this alone."

quote:

---

Is it a desire to defend it or to understand it? 1:1 God created heaven & earth. End of story or opening line?
1:2 says the earth is a void, a deep above which God hovered? (1:3)Then He created light &

---

quote:

---

As I was trying to point out is the nature of the narative, especially those coming or being preseded by an oral tradition tend to use particular form to give continuity and flow.

---

quote:

---

Firmament in the midst of the waters

---

quote:

---

Looking at your references was indicative (at least to me) that the earth & heaven spoken of, was not the same perception as that which exist today. Which is stated in the OT so it doesn't seem that unreasonable as science has shown evidence of extreme changes as well.

---

"Terrorist or tyrant, few may come to the Truth that both are poor choice."
[  Edited by cturtle at   ]

Yeah!

"Durch Nacht und Blut das Licht"

here's an intersting link. http://www.thefinaltheory.com/pages/9/index.htm

main idea i saw was that our knowledge builds off of observation and speculation. if we are not observing something that is there, we can not speculate over it.

"as i see it the only "variable" in the equation is THOUGHT. you are capable of changing this and this alone."
[  Edited by iSOUGHT|THOUGHT at   ]

I am not sure what link is saying as my browser (plugin) didn't load? FireFox has trouble with Macromedia & other IE formats.
So I would have to point to Ion /Atom & Electron/ Electricity threads to relate the content to it as a starting point?
As stated the periodic table (& chemicalbonding itself) deals with the effect of negatively charge particles. Yet the nucleas contains both neutral & positvely charged particles. The one to one ratio of charged (+/-) particles indicates that some relationship exist between these particles but what relationship is defined?

"Terrorist or tyrant, few may come to the Truth that both are poor choice."

it's a book by a man named Mark McCutcheon- The Final Theory, rethinking our scientific legacy.

i don't have too much info concerning atoms as of yet. High School Chem. class was right after lunch break... you could say i failed that class in "a BLAZE of glory".

"as i see it the only "variable" in the equation is THOUGHT. you are capable of changing this and this alone."

oh, is attraction and repulsion the relationship you speak of?

"as i see it the only "variable" in the equation is THOUGHT. you are capable of changing this and this alone."

What would happen if people were just given bibles instead of being told what they are, what would happen then?

What would the stories gore and worship sound like, what do they sound like to you.

"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

i'm thinking if a group of people with no knowledge of semantics, (concerning the bible) when reading the many varrying stories, would come to a conclusion that it speaks of physical life (and how extremely fucked up it can be) and something it likes to refer to as spiritual life.

from there i think they would do the same thing people in history have done - focus on all the gore and negativity it's speaking against. But it is easy to do that when you skim the pages/

gotta read every line and cross reference them all too before you build organized religions off of it, especially ones that dictate the momentum of your government. in my very humble opinion ( ;

"as i see it the only "variable" in the equation is THOUGHT. you are capable of changing this and this alone."

You could even stop and say, wow, this is just a book.....

Try that one on for size. Just for shits and giggles.

"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

don't plenty do that now? i thought we were being hypothetical/

"as i see it the only "variable" in the equation is THOUGHT. you are capable of changing this and this alone."

No, I'm not sure enough do, and hypothetical is fine and dandy but I'd like some progress in this world too thanks.

"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

let's close the "book" on this chapter and start off on another page.

leftwood and myself, in attempts to hurl the human race past their present state of religious dillusion, offer up a new and previously unimmaginable approach on the Bible...

it's just a book

just written by people

that just had some ideas to relay

which just happen to envoke speculation

that need not be considered. no, nothing at all contextual

in fact... don't even consider the existence of the ink and paper

"as i see it the only "variable" in the equation is THOUGHT. you are capable of changing this and this alone."