where's the need for negativity to exist ?
It's a probability based on the fact that it does and always has, as indeed an integral and cohesive structural component of the reality we percieve and judge.
Because surely you are not suggesting that something that is not "sweet" to you is not important on many levels not excluding your basic survival.
To rant, our opinion, judgement, and influenced subjective perspectives derived from limited personal experience and comprehension, suffered by all humans, is safe to say, questionable, in regards to our labeling of human acts as good or bad, possitive or negative, necessary or otherwise.
We can choose to make, follow, and judge by such standards, or base them on their affects for or against our chosen goals as a individuals and a species. But it will be forever skewed in bias and human intellectual limitation.
or to appreciate the contrast if and when you experience positivity and then value the positive.
is that what u mean ?
Pretty much, its just variance. It variety, its life spice. We can be a boring existance of nothing, or energy, or we can be people, planets, universes, and stuff.
Negative and possitive are not moral judgements they are statements of varied existance. Polar opposites. They can be made of the same exact materials, or not, be charged one way or another or simply taste different, whatever. They are just different forms of existance and natural reactive consequential behavior.
What you call damaged some call sensible. Some would call it enlightened, some would call it cat food.
But do not misunderstand me, I speak and write for the simple joy of shapes and sounds like any other good upright less hairy (not quite hairless) ape like thingy.
Because I know I don't know, and that our words are contradictory soup of meaningful meaninglessness, both right and wrong when infinite perspectives are available.
(To secretly continue rant) For example, if you and I were to wake up on an island devoid of any food save one carrot, who would deserve to eat it, what circumstances would define the eating of the carrot by any party as right or wrong, what would it matter once they both starve anyway?
These are just things I wonder at two in the morning, I apologize, feel free to make sense of them if there is any to be made.