Why Condone Fruitless Deviant Behavior?

As stated, the last few posts were in reference to this question:

"If homosexuality IS a choice, should it be systematically eliminated from humanity?"

"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

If homosexuality is a choice, (not based on a genetic predisposition towards homosexuality), it makes several blaring declarations about the individual's perspective towards traditional membership in mainstream society.

Society: an enduring and cooperating social group whose members have developed organized patterns of relationships through interaction with one another or a broad grouping of people having common traditions, institutions, and collective activities and interests.

Choosing to be homosexual removes one's responsiblity to contribute to society as it is structured. It's actually a choice to promote another type of society, its activities and interests

It's easiest to key in on the fact that homosexuality lacks the ability to naturally grow its ranks through procreation. But this is only one apparent contradiction the homosexual social grouping represents.

Someone might argue that homosexual society increases its ranks by being a genetic occurrence naturally found in human beings.

This does not negate the fact that the homosexual life represents an exchange of one social contract for another.

This makes the activity fruitless on many levels because one social order doesn't generally sustain or contribute to the endurance of another.

So from the perspective of mainstream society homosexuality is non-productive because it doen't re-produce that very society.

Expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior for a member of homosexual society is actually counterproductive for the other society.

To continue to say homosexuals contribute to the rearing of children is not to say that they are not deviant. Unless they are contradicting themselves, the homosexual is going to promote their society and corresponding philosophy.

I wonder if the tables were turned and heterosexuals were the minority or deviants from social order if we would ignore the differences and what they symbolize and represent.

Homosexuality is not a completely non-productive lifestyle. I just believe that ultimately there will always be the fact that it is activity that does not produce what society needs to continue.

In the context of heterosexual society homosexuality is not reasonable or "sane".

"You are affected by 3 generations and you affect 3 generations, and every third generation a major change takes place in the family."

quote:

---

Society: an enduring and cooperating social group whose members have developed organized patterns of relationships

---

quote:

---

Choosing to be homosexual removes one's responsiblity to contribute to society as it is structured.

---

quote:

---

It's easiest to key in on the fact that homosexuality lacks the ability to naturally grow its ranks through procreation.

---

quote:

---

This does not negate the fact that the homosexual life represents an exchange of one social contract for another.

---

quote:

---

So from the perspective of mainstream society homosexuality is non-productive because it doen't re-produce that very society.

---

quote:

---

Expressing or teaching a conception of right behavior for a member of homosexual society is actually counterproductive for the other society.

---

quote:

---

Homosexuality is not a completely non-productive lifestyle. I just believe that ultimately there will always be the fact that it is activity that does not produce what society needs to continue.

---

quote:

---

In the context of heterosexual society homosexuality is not reasonable or "sane".

---

quote:

---

In the context of heterosexual society homosexuality is not reasonable or "sane".

---

"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

Seeing as how the human race is overpopulating, and destroying our beautiful home, don't you think it better to have a society filled with people who DON'T have children?

I mean, we wage war with each other, generally shit on the neighbours we have in our own countries and show little to no concern over the fact that we are damaging the environment beyond repair.

Yet you would say that the act of having bountiful amounts of unprotected sex without a single chance of pregnancy is a BAD THING?!!

"Always give to the left, coz the right way is the wrong way."

Meth: The fallacy in your argument is you seem to believe the pro-creation by everyone is necessary for the survival of humans as a species, whereas it can be argued that having homosexuals limits our growth (amongst other influences) which may also be a requirement for our survival, from a social standpoint.

The basic point is that deviancy from the norm in any form does not make the activity fruitless... it may be an entirely necessary deviation for the survival of the species.

Certain deviants not only don't procreate, but actually destroy life... I'd say such criminals are STILL a necessary part of society.

"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

If it is a deviation which is necessary for existence--than it is not really a "deviation". Given you know not what purpose homosexuality does serve or contributes...you cant assume "because it exists" it is necessary or alright..


But because it has proven not to be an equal preference of any sexual act. Aside from tall, short, skinny, fat..big breastss-any number of preferences a hetero/or homo..would choose. This preference is for one of the same sex.

Homos cannot argue heterosexuality as fruitless.-but heteros can argue homosexuality as so.

Because we dont know its purpose.


You may argue that it has purpose-because we have no proof that it does or doesnt.

but it is a preference.-which means it is not necessary for the survival of anyone..including themselves.



reply to..that girls post..--"Many of the great artists and scholars of history were homosexual, is that really a mental impurity if they still contributed greatly to the progress of mankind?"

sexual preference is ..a sexual preference. W/e contributions this man has made to humanity--has nothing to do with his sexual preference. Although you may assume that this preference has allowed him more insight and ability in developing helpful and progressive..w/e's. The ability also, is proven to exist in heterosexuals and homosexuals..

"In this world, we are never lacking. Only losing what we have in hope of gaining what we dont."

quote:

---

Given you know not what purpose homosexuality does serve or contributes...you cant assume "because it exists" it is necessary or alright..

---

quote:

---

Homos cannot argue heterosexuality as fruitless.-but heteros can argue homosexuality as so.

Because we dont know its purpose.

---

quote:

---

but it is a preference.-which means it is not necessary for the survival of anyone..including themselves.

---

quote:

---

sexual preference is ..a sexual preference.

---

quote:

---

W/e contributions this man has made to humanity--has nothing to do with his sexual preference. Although you may assume that this preference has allowed him more insight and ability in developing helpful and progressive..w/e's. The ability also, is proven to exist in heterosexuals and homosexuals..

---

"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

It is not a sexual preference. People are born that way, animals are born that way.

It being a sexual preference is a theoretical scenario.

Do you comprehend that it is not a sexual preference? By definition if it has existed in humanity since record-keeping has existed, it is valid to argue that it provides a necessary function for humans to exist.

And I say that although i do not know FOR SURE which one it is, if you want a viable option, lets just say popluation control.

"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

If you dont have to lay in bed with them why the hell do you care?? Spend time talking about somthing that will actually help the world--not stir up more drama

"If paybacks a bitch and revenge is sweet--Im the sweetest bitch you'll ever meet"

quote:

---

If homosexuality is a choice, (not based on a genetic predisposition towards homosexuality)

---

"He who does not question is lost."

The thing is, no one has any right to say if it's right or wrong, the only confirmed thing is that it is unnatural, which is niether degrading nor uplifting. Even if this humble assumption is disregarded, u need 2 take out that screw outta ur head

"I'll heal ur woundz I'll set u free, I m jesus christ on xtacy"

quote:

---

the only confirmed thing is that it is unnatural

---

"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

Every single organ of the human body has a purpose. The purpose of a penis is therfore that it can enter a vagina of a women, to produce children. If the man decides to put his Johnson inside her aas or mouth, that is unnatural, that is not what the organs were desighned to do.

"I'll heal ur woundz I'll set u free, I m jesus christ on xtacy"

my tongue was desighned to taste, be it an apple or an ass, now if I decide that I wan't to play badmionton with it-that defeats the purpose a little bit, it is unnatural.

"I'll heal ur woundz I'll set u free, I m jesus christ on xtacy"

quote:

---

that is unnatural, that is not what the organs were desighned to do.

---

"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"