| 
the aliens idea is possible. but tonloc think about what you have said for ten seconds, and possibly actually read what some of us have said. i said evolution an the big bang were gods method of creation, instead of the idealised version that occurs in genesis. that version was written by a jewish scholar before they knew the earth was round not flat (unless you're one of the strange little cult that to this day believe someones going to fall off the edge soon). you dont agree with a jew on a lot of religious issues, why are you so sure about this one? what is wrong with the idea of evolution or the big bang being gods way of doing things, they are as good as any other. and as for darwin being a racist, that is what is known as an "ad hominem" attack, it means an irrelevant personal attack in an attempt to discredit the authors arguement. i dont agree with racism, but it was quite a widely held view at the time darwin lived. the idea of evolution stands to reason, for example, why are there no human remains older than a certain age, yet a line of remains which go from apes to humans? or arent they real? or is that the point at which adam and eve came out of the garden of eden? i think that genesis is a story, like the ones jesus told, it is a parable, it tells that the devil tempted humanity, which it did, and it gives an example of sins (cain and able). it is like every other religious story about how the world started, completely untrue, but quite a good read, and has a few morals thrown in. that may sound a bit blasphemous, but its my opinion. as for the whole thing being coincidence, i think its a mathematical possibility. how many stars do you see at night? and then think there are ones you cant see, cos they are too far away, or on the other side of the planet, if each of those has 9 planets, i think the probablity of life happening by coincidence on one of them, is less than the number of planets, even to the extent that i think it may have happened on more than one. but i feel that religion and science are linked, the bible tells us what god did, the bible tells us how he did it. the arguement for their being a creator ive heard, is that if you see a beatiful house or watch, you know someone designed it, now look at the universe, you know someone must have designed it, and that someone is god. ill go back to the house idea, the universe is a house, the bible is the thing you get from the estate agents, which tells you all the pretty details, like number of rooms and whether or not you get an en suite. science is like the blue print, it tells you what proportions things need to be, and how many bricks and tiles you'll need to make it, as well as the supports that need to be in place, that no one will see (gravity, etc) anyone see what im getting at, or do you all just think im talking bull here?
"So Schrodinger's Cat is not only neither dead nor alive, but might also be sexually aroused by elbows and peanut butter?"
|