| 
In reference to the Just war requirements- Right authority: Only duly constituted public authorities may use deadly force or wage war Just cause: Force may be used only to correct a grave public evil, e.g. a massive violation of the basic rights of whole populations Right intention: Force may be used only in a truly just cause and solely for that purpose; Correcting a suffered wrong is considered a right intention, while material gain is not. No modern war can possibly meet Just war standards. Here are some reasons why war isn't just. Morality can't or should not exist in war, it can only exist in a peaceful situation. Killing innocent people is wrong. George Bush advocated the protection of innocent lives, yet during war the lives of innocents weren't guaranteed. Therefore, unless the lives of innocents can be guaranteed, war cannot be justified under any grounds. Life is sacred. Wars cannot achieve political & social goals. Wars hinder rather than help in attaining important ends. Wars risk the future of the Human race. War shouldn't be a government power. War has become something which is inherently outside the moral sphere of state activity. Wars of aggression are wrong. The US initiated the violence and began the war. There is always an aggressor and hence someone has acted immorally. War violates international law. War is contrary to national self-interest. As i've mentioned before, the Iraqi war was primarily for power, not peace (as all wars are). War has reduced the security of U.S. citizens and most of the contemporary western world. The broad American consensus that Bush's war is ''just'' represents a shallow assessment of that war, a shallowness that results from many factors such as ignorance and feeblemindedness.
"The summit is just a halfway point"
|