| 
In response to Decius D -" Well, I believe in a very logical sense of fate: If everything is cause and effect, then everything is pre-determined because the future is an effect of our present, which is the cause." MC - If everything is based on cause and effect, we have a chicken and egg situation. What was the first cause? Our world of duality makes it extremely difficult to think outside the boundaries of up/down, start/finish, left/right, cause/effect. We relate to things "sensually" and then begin to build relationships on our sensual understanding of things. MC - An instance of this is to define "define". ie: use the dictionary for the meaning of "define". You will only understand the explanation of the word "define" if you have a pre-built relationship with those other words. If the other words had no meaning to you, and you looked up the meaning to each of those words, we get stuck in an ever expanding continuum. But if we begin to understand the concepts of each of the words sensually and relatively speaking, then we can at least convince ourselves that we understand the meanings and definitions. D-"The answer to your question is yes, if you knew your fate, then you would have the choice to change it." MC -IMHO, to know or not know our fate, we can still "change" it. I think a mistake we often make is that we might think fate will determine who we are, and especially when relating it to death of the body. So many apply the same set of rules to astrology. I feel it is more accurate to view 'fate' as 'karmic influences' and planet movements as "astrological influences', neither rule or determine who, when or what we are completely but we are influenced by them. Again though, we have to try to step outside our sense perceptions that make this world of duality and it's laws seem so real. D - "Basically, knowledge of the future changes that future because that "fortune" or "fate" was based on a reality prior to you knowing what the future held." MC - But what if we could see something, knowing it is going o happen but we know it is necessary for our development and so we allow it to be fulfilled. It certainly seems obvious to me that someone such as Jesus was completely aware of what was going to transpire at his crucifixion and had prior knowledge. He could have changed those events but for certain reasons knew that it had to happen in that way. MC - Because of our senses and our hypnosis of the reality of time and space, we believe that we are constantly going from a to b or that the present is constantly getting kicked up the ass by the future. In fact, when we attempt to remove that conceptual framework of time vs space, it seems that none of our laws of physics hold true in their truest sense. They are only meaningful in this dimension of matter. MC - Consider for a moment another chicken and egg concept. Does consciousness create matter or matter create consciousness? MC - Certainly a way to understand this is to think about the creation process. When you want to create something, it begins from thought, from ideas and slowly materialises, the more you focus open that thought or idea. The thoughts and ideas are not only much easier concieved than their material equivalent but also exist prior to their material existence (which creates our concept of time). Thought and ideas exist outside the realm of 1+1=2. Attempt to measure thoughts, measure imagination, measure ideas and attempt place the much accepted framework of time vs space around them and you can begin to understand the fallacy of time and space. So is, time and space real? I once spent 3 days and night without sleep pondering this. I wouldn't like to try and convince anyone they are not real. To do so, one has to first "give" them a reality they do not have, then once they have a reality of some sort, you can attempt to prove them false. Whether or not that is an acceptable answer, I was satisfied enough to sleep Just my $5 worth
"You are not what you think you are. What you think, you are"
[ Edited by salubrium at
]
|