| 
the presumption that she wouldnt want to get pregnant is a natural one considering that you said she was onyl 14 when they started. and if she did want to get pregnant, then she would not have gone on the pill even if offered it. i myself believe that if you are going to have sex then protection is recommended unless you are trying for kids. but in this case she was, and therefore your anger at her mother is totally misplaced. christianity spawns some idiots. but every religion spawns its zealots, and a large majority are not as heavy handed or dogmatic as the zealots. but it is not evil by design, it is evil through peoples misreadings of it. (except bits of leviticus etc but that was a set of rules for jews of that period not for modern day christians, so we dont stone gays or sell our daughters into slavery as it says we may or should) i personally dont like organised religion much, there is so much wrong with the whole thing, but i find many of the arguements put forward very closed minded and ignorant. yours i understand the reasoning of, but various others have gone out with the intention of getting the wrong end of the stick and beating christianity about the head with it.
"So Schrodinger's Cat is not only neither dead nor alive, but might also be sexually aroused by elbows and peanut butter?"
|