| 
The striking similar formulation between electromagnetic & gravity suggest that these phenomenas share a similar source? The inverse square of distance is relative ly the same functional value then one could consider that they have other similarities.
Science provides that a gravitational constant exist; then is there a similar electromagnetic constant? The value of attraction of gravity is proportional to distance & mass so as electromagnetic field is flux density => then does gravitational values depend upon a gravitational flux density?
quote:
Old school teachers used bar magnets placed behind (beniegh) a piece of paper & used iron filings to produce a visual representation of the lines of force of the magnetic field
Well as long as poles are relative to the plane of the paper when the pole is held perpendicular, the filings simply are attracted to the pole. Hmm . . . I wonder could gravity have poles similar to magnets (at the atomic level)? But that would be rediculous, because of the structure of atoms, a cental core of inertial mass & positive charge shielded by a negative charge?
Ah, where does the flux density its highest value? Where the lines of force converge to pass through the core of the magnet .Then the greatest value for gravitational fluxy should exist where the lines of force pass through their core?
but then science doesn't conceive gravitational field as it relates to electromagnetic field?
"Terrorist or tyrant, few may come to the Truth that both are poor choice."
[ Edited by cturtle at
]
|
Hmm . . .may be the dark (matter) holes are the dark side of the sun (stars)? Eh . . . as far as that goes it being relative then as we exist as an extension of our elemental parts then our elementary nature is also an extension of our composite being? 
