| 
although i do agree that there are auithorites out there that attempt to tell us what things are and should not be, the acceptance of this truth derives from us. for something to be true we must self-authenticate the truth that is presented to us. we only agree with an authorative position (something meant to coerce into accepting a fact) if it does not affect us emotionally, we disagree with something if it does. for example an astronmer who obviously knows alot about stars tells us a star is some billion miles away, well what do i care about the stars, so we agree with the astronmer, but say an mathmatician, is also a scientist, gives usamount of $50, in some circumstances this does not matter, but if this amount left by our dead aunt we get upset and tell him to recaculate it and hope its more a man who writes an anatomy book tells us a toe is a toe, a society based on the ideal ego tells us that our outer shell, our skin our toes etc is who we are and that is our being, society places its ideals on us at a young age, but as long we do not question, since i doubt the naming of the toe has no emotinal quarrell with us, then that is what we know, that is what we accept, all of our beliefs our definitions depend on whether are not we shall accept them
"those who have the most to gain have the greatest desire to deceive, those who have the least to gain, and who want nothing--like the saints--can love perfectly, and that love is not an illusion"
|