| 
"I would just like to add that some of you have pretty bad double standards. You complain when we DONT go into a country to help (Africa), but when we DO, you start complaining that our motives are wrong." Its not double standards. The US isn't going to Irak to help, its going into Irak to get cheap petrol, have sole access to a new market and this under a blatantly false pretense. "I think its great that they changed french fries to freedom fries. I think it makes people more patriotic to think that there better." Patriotism is dangerous. Patriotism is almost racism. Patriotism is nationalism and nationalism is what let Hitler accomplish his heinous crimes. "I think the United States does to much to help other people when all it seems to be doing is pissing people off." Please learn some history. The US rarely goes into a country "just" to help them. Did you know the US supported Sadam taking power in Irak? Did you know the US removed a democratically elected leader of Chile and replaced it with a militaristic dictator who then commited terrible crimes? Finally, the US did not go to Irak to save its people. That may be a happy side effect however. The official reasons is the PROTECTION OF THE US, not help the Iraki people. The real reason was access to the Iraki market, the ability to create and use military bases in Irak, access to cheap Iraki petrol. The liberation of the iraki people is a happy consequence is a happy side effect, though that may not even last long (like Afganistan) while the protection of the US people was not an issue, Irak was not a "clear and present danger".
"Durch Nacht und Blut das Licht"
|