| 
Shadow: Neither you or kookie make a valid point.
Wars do not lead to free speech.
Your first fallacy is you are grouping all "wars" into one category. There are many types of wars, but the two main ones are imperialistic ones, and defensive ones.
Imperialistic wars do NOT promote freedom. In fact, they are made up of the same stuff that Saddam is made out of.
Defensive wars are wars like World War 2... where your personal freedom is affected by someone or some country that initiates an "Imperialistic" war.
The point is that this war is not a defensive one. There is absolutely no factual logic behind this being a defensive war.
1. Saddam has not been linked to terrorists. In fact, Saddam's regime is deathly opposed to Osama...and they are in fact bitter enemies. Therefore, Iraq is not a terrorist threat.
2. Saddam has no chemical or nuclear weapons. If he had any, he would have used them on American soldiers because...well, he is a "bastard", which is one of the reasons you "Warmongers" say he should be taken out. A bastard would use any means possible to eradicate his enemies, which include chemical weapons. THe fact that he hasn't used any certifies that he in fact has none. This means that he is not a nuclear threat.
3. Even if Saddam did have nuclear or chemical weapons, that does not justify invading Iraq. North Korea has weapons, India has weapons, Pakistan has weapons, France has weapons....the list goes on and on. A majority of these countries hold absolutely no alliegance to USA, which makes them as much a threat as Iraq. Therefore if this is a "defensive" war, then the true extension of this would be global domination. And global domination is actually "Imperialism". Therefore, this war isn't about removing nuclear threats to USA, because if it was then Iraq would be one of the many countries on the globe to attack. And if you condone world war 3, which encompasses USA conquering the globe, then I believe you are chemically imbalanced.
Therefore, the facade of us attacking Iraq for "defensive" reasons is completely false.
And the only other types of wars are Imperialistic ones.
Therefore, you are supporting an imperialistic war, which makes you "the dark side" of Star Wars.
Note: In case you didn't know, the "dark" side of the force's soldiers were called "Imperials".
Nazis were attempting to be imperialistic, as were the Japanese. Romans were imperialistic, Greeks were Imperialistic, even Muslims were imperialistic. Imperial nations have always ended up collapsing. That's the way it has always been. There is no Roman empire, there is no Greek empire, there is no Nazi empire, there is no Japanese empire, and there will be no American empire.
Yall gotta stop looking at people like me as attackers and see that it really has little to do with emotion or intent.
The facts point to a complete falseness in this war. That's the fact.
"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."
[ Edited by Decius at
]
|
