| 
I'm going to clear a little way here for what I see. In truth, I honestly believe that there is no right or wrong in terms of what is. To me, the essence of right or wrong action brings about it the nature of judgement. Seriously, I doubt God sits on a throne and judges right or wrong action...this would be more the role of aliens (theres a thought!). God is the inner voice that guides; but in our world of thinking, where knowledge becomes tainted, this voice is often misinterpreted and is something rather different. I do not believe we have right and wrong naturally instilled in us; what I do believe is that 'naturally' in the physical world, we wish to protect ourselves, our kids and our kind to sustain. Thus any action of right or wrong, at this level, is relative to the order of approximation to the self; e.g. compare mother stealing food for her kids to mother stealing for greed. The 'why' factor is often unkown, can be led by hurt, and could be led by any less progressive emotion that renders insufficient progress of the individual. The 'why' factor is always only really know to the individual in question. However, if you began to understand why people do things then you would see it is due to some sort of less productive emotion. If we had the time and effort in this world to understand everybody, there would be no need for laws, we'd recognise we all have the potential to be alike. However, still stuck by the natural laws of reproduction and other human induced factors, we neglect this and substitute in laws to preserve law and order and civil society. Freedom will never prevail under this scheme, and therefore it is not right; but arguably necessary for the majority to be able to live as free as possible. In sum, there is no right and wrong ultimately; but perhaps for the better, in thsis world, we need laws, if be they illusional, to preserve the majorities aims. As to the original question: i don't know why evil exists. I'd satb at something similar to a learning curve. However, this does not mean God does not exist. You will hear supposedly wise philosophers say 'I can't conceive of a God that would wish evil' However they still hold judgement in this by means of comparing what they believe is right with what they believe is not right. Why does hurt have to be a bad thing, can it not just be a thing? Or, can it not be a thing to build upon? God is not righteousness; love is God.
""No words""
|