| 
I've had thoughts like that before, because every time I see a picture of the Judeo-Christian God, I think to myself...doesn't it say somewhere that you should not depict said God and that this God is above thought and cannot be conceived or understood on any level of consciousness? I'm not a Biblical scholar or anything, but I think those are mentioned somewhere, like you said. And it just further led me against the belief of such a God. If this God is beyond said thought and the only thing known about this God is that this God is beyond our perception, then what is the point, exactly? Why even bother acknowledging such a thing? And does it not just make you want to turn the other direction and say the probability of such a God is very small? This being - who is beyond just being a being, I can't even conceive him, so when I say this, I'm speaking as if I CAN - created everything is all knowing, omnipotent and powerful......... But you can't conceive this God in any sense. It makes no sense to me. I just don't think it makes sense -period-. It seems to me, it's proving the likelihood of this God's NONexistance. You're putting this God (in the logical and reasonable person's mind) in a position that compares it in a way that proves dragons, unicorns and jackalopes more likely to exist, because we can actually imagine such things and create an image, a smell, a feel, a taste, a sound...we can use our senses to consider such things to exist, whereas with said God, we can't.
"Inspire."
|