| 
I've read the site.
You'll find that in any age its characterised by political correctness, the moral teachings of the day and their interpretation and the studies that are going around.
True science is void of this; but scientists aren't and you'll find formal ways of doing things, things that aren't allowed to be said, etc.
The truth, for me at least, lies in both scientific studies and religious teachings.
Of course evolution is true; we observe it. Animals who *adapt* to their environment *better* than others will *survive* longer than those *worse* suited to their environment. If you argue against this then you are insane.
The argument put by this site that the *best* survive false. It is the *better* that survive. Likewise, evolutionism may claim certain species and races are more superior than others. In an animal kingdom these vices are fitness; strength, stamina, suppleness, ability to swim, etc. In the social bit, its more hard because we have such diverse cultures and weapons that will blow each other up. To that end, science comes politicized. Its that point where the site is correct, but there is truth on the grey bit between science and politics; its just very hard to establish.
Evolution, then, at its basic, natural level, where we're talking animals and bushy trees and hunting, can be observed. And we can observe beaviours in social groupings that match psychological behaviour. Its only because the groupings are so diverse that we can't really apply pyschology to evolutionism. That's a mistake.
Other than that, the site - and Islam- teaches morals, and so long as smart people are reading it; they will understand that it teaches peace and, ultimately, and this is what its really about - a code of conduct that prevents us going back to living as *beasts*.
Too many thinkers and not enough free thinkers.
"Only gay people have quotes to look good"
|
