| 
ChrisD, That seems to me, to be a terrible judgement to make - that if you do not focus on challenging the confines of society, you are not an artist. Art can be made in such a variety of ways for many reasons and intentions. I do not understand how can you so securley define such a subjective term. To me, art is simply the expression of the human mind, its thoughts, feelings and interests through a range of different mediums. I believe art to be a simple labelling of the product of expression, not a labelling that marks value. Whether it is meaningful or unmeaningful is entirely dependant upon the eye of the beholder, but the interpretation that is made is always a subjective one. I do not believe that anyone, apart from the maker themselves, has the right to take the labelling of the word art itself away from the expression. You are wholly entitled to have your opinion of it being "good", "bad", "meaningful" or "unmeaningful", and your opinion should always be respected and accepted as a valid interpretation. However, I think it is highly conceited to state in such a matter-of-fact way, to any individual or group, that their expressions are just simply not art. That undermines the validity of the work even being an expression. I think it is highly disrespectful of other peoples opinions, interpretations and personal expressions. As for whether or not I even wish to consider myself an artist or wish to make a career out of writing poetry - I would have appreciated it if you had actually asked me about my intentions before making the insinuation that I may already believe myself to be an artist, and then telling me why I shouldn't or cannot see myself as one.
"http://yes-virginia.deviantart.com/"
|