| 
I noticed this post and remembered the discussion about the theory of eternal recurrence, the idea that when we die we are reborn as who we are in the same year, on the same day, in the same house and live our lives all over again. I was pleased to see the responses to the idea but was surprised by some people's problem with the concept based on ordinary conceptions of time. Some people couldn't understand how your best friend, who dies at 12 for instance, can somehow chronologically be reborn at the correct time so that it all works out perfectly the second, third, fourth (and so on and so on) times around. It disappointed me that people still think of time as some chronological "line" with events happening in order from the beginning until the end of time. Based on the well-known "special theory of relativity" we have every reason to believe that time is much more interesting than that. It may be that the past, present, and future all exist together as one in space-time. Moreover, time-experience may actually be "malleable" in such a way that it may move "slower" or "faster" for each of us, allowing for unlimited and strange possibilities. And, finally, if it is true that we live within our own little "circle" of space and time beyond which nothing else exists then, yes (as DarkJester so eloquently explained), this “chronological problem’ would certainly not be an issue at all. Eternal recurrence is, of course, only a theory, but an interesting one. And this “chronological problem” does not constitute, atleast for me, a very strong argument against it.
"Each conscious mind is alone in the universe!"
|