| 
well most of these sights are pretty sexist, especially the second one--the guy runs a sight in which he has all these conservative opinions about women and gays and even has a forum--but the only thing is that you cant post on his forum unless you agree with him. so whats the point of having a forum in the first place??? the first sight was kind of funny i thought, and i agreed with some of what it said about marriage, but a good deal of it also seemed pretty stereotypical. i would say that feminism does get carried away a lot of times and a lot of women do use it as a tool to actually be sexist against men, but the alternative is male-driven society. i figure in the future it will all balance out, as things tend to do--first the pendulum swings one way, then the other, and then it kind of comes to a standstill. the bottom line is that women and men are different, and some things cant be equal for both sexes because of these biological differences. the paper by schopenhauer(this is all the further i got) was pretty dated, even if he was a prominant guy. people should look for faults in whatever they read, even if it was by a world-renouned philosopher, and not just take at as gospel because the guy's smart and happens to agree with what they say.
"You are reading this."
|