| 
So science states that the at some level, we have the inertia => rotational momentum of our spin. Then another is represented by the earth-moon spin, then another by our solar system; as our system is part of a larger (greater) system called the Milky Way, etc.
Then the question arises 'Why would those actions (bonds) stop at the molecular? So we could question does perception of particles in space continue or include our own space?Perhaps those strange considerations of the D & F orbitals, exist as or at least in the inertial form of these extensions of our (solar) system in space? Why the additional 'at least in the inertial form' , because we haven't really discussed an aspect of inertia. Which is to say as we in the relative sense are in constant motion to these other reference system, we tend not to note their inertia relative to our own system. Thus even as we extend our perception from the flat earth to a revolving planet within a system of planets, etc., we may be imposing an aspect of inertia (mass & energy) which includes aspects of phase & phase relationship (3-d & time). So we are in fact setting a (relative) absolute value as our reference system?
To an extent, you could say that because the inertial function is continually changing then the spatial relationship must continually (constant) change in order to maintain the spatial relationship. Our view of the '3-d & time' then represents or has an aspect similar to the implied STP, setting a particular value as Absolute Zero against which we relate other values too.
"Terrorist or tyrant, few may come to the Truth that both are poor choice."
[ Edited by cturtle at
]
|
