| 
The fact that the initial comparison is spectacularly redundant doesn't help this thread, nobody looks for the same answers from their cellphone as they do from a bible. Though that doesn't mean that the wonderfully imaginative minds that invented the dystopian future full of bible bashing sheep, are much closer to anything sensible. As you may have noticed, we have developed out of the middle ages as education became more widely available, christian monks were generally some of the most educated people around, they were the first to read, and much of western chemistry and physics is based on experiments done by monks as they were the ones with the free time necessary. Add to this the fact that nowadays there are many modern liberal Christians (most of whom wouldn't burn homosexuals and heretics even if it wasn't illegal), including in their number many scientists (a lot of whom believe in evolution, well those outside of the Alabama board of education anyway). There is nowhere in the bible that says "though shalt not use technology", it's possible to accept science can explain how things works and that god explains why, if that's what floats your boat. I'm fed up of the amount of christian bashing that exists. I'm not christian, but I have a fair number of friends that are, the only thing I resent them for is evangelism, I made my decision and it's highly unlikely that repeating the same formulas is going to convince me otherwise. I have my own moral compass, and I don't need a omnipotent bearded guy on a cloud to point out that if I fuck everything with a pulse and drink myself stupid on a daily basis things are unlikely to turn out well, any more than I need my biological father standing behind me telling me how to aim at a urinal. But as a set of rules, modern liberal christianity is by no means the worst that someone could choose to follow. People keep telling me that American Christians don't seem to follow this trend, so perhaps your intolerance is understandable, but don't let what is still a minority affect your view of a whole. Come on guys, let's be a little less one sided, Skittles at least has the excuse of being 12 to explain the naivety of the original post.
"So Schrodinger's Cat is not only neither dead nor alive, but might also be sexually aroused by elbows and peanut butter?"
|