| 
Couldn't say really, I don't think limitations are necessary, and I think ultimately that it is more important to have open accessible avenues to run or produce worthy candidates.
But given our current circumstances in the US, at least one more strong party but perhaps a couple to break up corruption and previous mind sets so stuck on two parties is necessary.
But for this to be truly effective, at least to my current goals, these parties would have to have access to and be protected from retribution for having access to and use of, taboo, revolutionary subjects and ideals, as well as some classified materials or people with access to them, even if as advisors.
Which would hopefully happen due to a breakdown or restructuring of party loyalties anyway.
And of course, true campaign reform. The rediculousness of the influence of money in politics has to go, or nothing will change.
If ever there was a government program to be had, probably locally, were some tax dollars could be put to good use, is to give people a voice.
Sure, there are some programs available and we are in need of addressing ignorance and apathy, but there are actively dissenting and change oriented voices that are not being heard, especially without ridicule and condemnation from authority figures and majorities, and they certainly aren't doing much in the way of education, they will be right in saying is needed, especially education that includes viewpoints other than their own, nullifying any education they do provide.
"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"
|
