Articles | Forums | Polls | Quotes | Who's Online | Store
Signup | Lost Password
"Gravity is a myth, the Earth just sucks." - PhoebeKnowsAll
Latest:Wyote

Your Authentic Music thread
Main -> Social Awareness -> Politics and Current Events  | NewPosts

All These F***ing Jews

USER THREAD
154 Posts / 14M
     :   18yrs   :  
zachfrenzel

Ok basics out of the way first my friend is not a idiot and i take offense to the assumtions made to his intilectly. He studys a lot of relgious philophy and room is filled with writings of different relgions and books that could help one understand the deeper meanings that those beliefs and there effect of soicity. So i would be very shocked if he was reciting somthing he was told and on top of that he is young and hasn't been in collage for to long.

The secound part to that is a lot of famous scientists mix triditional study of philiophy and theory with observations from the real world and this how they came up with a lot of thought that helped to push us where we are today. Without both understanding and observations of the what is already there we are just rediscovering what was already discovered.

third to clalify what i was saying above is that is simply imposble to hold two belief systems at the same time without compromising one of the systems. So from the unstanding of judeism science beside is that they beleave that the last profit has not showen himself so a compromise between the constution would allow one to be a jew and functioning member of soicity at the sametime. In the same sense that a cathlic is able to be both. Without being a bigit.

Ok enough of that i'm sick of trying to pull up facts for you conter so i'll throw somthing back there and if you'd answer that maybe it'll clarify both sides.

1st i recall becuase to dispite my posting history i've been following this site for quite sometime and a recall dercius and correct me cause i've been throught a couple surgerys these past few years and makes my memory smuge but i think i recall a time when you had your personal quote saying somthing to the effect of everyone's in the world for them selfs and as soon as you can except that you can start bennifting yourself and others. Is that not exactally the problem you have with jews only in group.

2nd do you have numbers that represent i mean figures and statistics that when a jews enter a community they're beliefs effect the soicity in a truely significant manner.

These are just questions not meant to spite you although they may come off that way it is just how i write. please respond


"Be careful what you pretend to be because you are what you pretend to be. So it goes. - Vonnegut"
[  Edited by zachfrenzel at   ]

154 Posts / 14M
     :   18yrs   :  
zachfrenzel

ok to claify above decius and ironwood and anyone else this post has been bugging me only because i live in a house built firmly on exspetance of all. That being said it is tuff for me to except most of what you say as true. I have looked at other sites and such i am not close minded and i do agree with you 100% the eastren relgions (judism, islam and christanty) are elitest and that infact they do hurt a soicty my issue lies now in the singling out of jews (because as far as i can see they are all guilty of the same crimes). That also being said i would like to thank you and aplogise for my ignorance. You broken a wall that some how tied rasim and reglious hatedred to toghter. I understand the difference and thank you again. - Frenzel


"Be careful what you pretend to be because you are what you pretend to be. So it goes. - Vonnegut"

384 Posts / 22M
     :   17yrs   :  
zyphon

you people spend your time debation on how others have screwed up and what their flaws are. big deal. everyone has flaws. my question is, why do people seem to want to believe that they are better than others? even if they are what does it matter? why can people not get along without finding somthing to fight over?
like decius (i dont know if you were saying this jokingly or seriously)

quote:
-Anyways, I'm smarter than your philosopher friend. Learn from me, not him.
no offense intended but doesnt that sound a bit full of your self? you may be stating a fact but from your opinion. do you know this pilosopher other than what he has said and you have heard 2nd hand?


"sad is the heart that loves. its usually broken"

SITE ADMIN
2841 Posts / 92M
     :   28yrs   :  
Decius

zyphon: The addressee of that comparison is known in the same regard that the addressee was introduced to me. The limitations of that introduction are known to me, you, and the "philosopher friend", and so although I know exactly why you've brought that up, now you know why you shouldn't have.

Secondly, you have to get around the politically correct idea that self-praise is a bad thing. It may sound like I'm full of myself, but you know nothing about me. Your statement is more presumptive and arrogant than mine because you are trying to tell me who I am even though you know nothing about me, whereas I know quite a bit about me.

Finally, let me get this straight - we shouldn't bring up other people's flaws, we shouldn't compliment ourselves... so in your world, everyone says bad things about themselves and good things about everyone else.

I know a place like that! Bullshitville!

Frenzel: You are absolutely correct - all three are guilty and all three should be condemned from that regard. However, you should know that the other two are spawns of the original... new releases so to speak. So talking about Judaism is important because it forms the basis for the other two, and as stated earlier, is a much clearer and more racist version of the two. The two new ones were actually created in an effort to make the original more accomodating. It's like talking about the original virus or its two mutations. All have relevancy - start a thread on Christianity if you want.


"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

154 Posts / 14M
     :   18yrs   :  
zachfrenzel

decius - that makes sense and thanks

zyphon - i can't speak for other people but i discuss others flaws in a attempt to elimate my own. A utopia socity can not be created from a uneducated populace.

The secound reason is if living in a soicty that is ruled by people who beleave that their relgion must due everything to insure its own survial and feel like they are constatly under attack. Then one would be unwise to know that their nabior views them as their enemy.


"Be careful what you pretend to be because you are what you pretend to be. So it goes. - Vonnegut"

384 Posts / 22M
     :   17yrs   :  
zyphon

decius -i know you thought of the limitations of how you could know the person and i realize that you know yourself. but i am a bit slower minded than you so i ask question in the hope of clarifying things generally thats why i state things hoping for someone to reply so that i can see there point of view on things.

yes i have grown up believing that i should not praise myself because i have done nothing worthy of self praising. im trying to understand why you wouuld make such a statement about why you are so much smarter. just from reading what you have written on this entire site i believe that you are quite a bit smarter anybody i know. probably including my teachers. i was not being presumptive or arrogant i was stating an opinion that said dont you think your a bit full of your self. and obviously you dont atleast not in how my typing suggested. you can play with words all you want. you confuse me anyways.
i talk about the good and bad of both me and others.
you presumed at how i am and how i act based off of one chat. is that not presumtive of you? or do you know alot about me?

religion in my opinion was created to justify the murder and persecution of others. humans want a reason to be right. if there particular god is behind them then they mush be right because there holy book said so! like the saying 'allah wills it' 'in gods name, i deliver justice unto this unbeliver'


"sad is the heart that loves. its usually broken"

3968 Posts / 49M
     :   31yrs   :  
Ironwood

quote:
religion in my opinion was created to justify the murder and persecution of others. humans want a reason to be right. if there particular god is behind them then they mush be right because there holy book said so! like the saying 'allah wills it' 'in gods name, i deliver justice unto this unbeliver'


Close, but you need to go one step further, it was created to control others, to make them kill while following the people in charge of these cults.

These religions are meant to shut your mind off by giving you "answers" and making you fear anything that challenges them, inducing fight for flight and perpetuating self sustained militant ignronce and judgement (i.e. racism and prejudice, gay bashers etc. ).

This does not mean that all people who attempt to follow religion are bad in their intentions, they just see the good parts and try to either fix it or more often just go along, which ends up as part of the problem, which does end in making them bad in their actions.

They tend to be trapped by tradition and superstition and can't get past the fear of freeing themselves, not for lack of propaganda of what will happen if they do.

They fear being outcast and alone, sweet irony in that their chosen "beliefs" perpetuate this atrocious behavior. So in that sense they are correct, they will be shunned by these mindless zombies of faith in lies.

quote:
if living in a soicty that is ruled by people who beleave that their relgion must due everything to insure its own survial and feel like they are constatly under attack. Then one would be unwise to know that their nabior views them as their enemy.


Indeed, but someone has to have the balls to stand up to them, to wake them up. And you will find that the majority of the faithful are in doubt because they aren't retarded, they are just scared to speak up. You being brave enough to pave the way only gives them the courage they need to join you.

Because those who truly want evil and control through such means are by far the minority.

See how both sides are too afraid to do anything, it seems more and more true that all we have to fear is indeed fear itself. Without it we would see our individual strength and the far greater strength in our numbers, as they enjoy now.

And why else is it ok to be without religion? Because it does not make one godless or against god. Not that that really matters but it is a most common charge and another tool to make people fear using their own minds.

And it is just as stupid to proclaim as fact that there is no god as it is to try to definitively define a god, the simple point that makes both atheist and religious arguments wrong and irrelevant.

The golden rule is the only legitimate part of any religion, the rest is bullshit. And again, this rule is independant of religion and therefore requires no religion to adhere to it.

The only other benefit to religion is the study of history and human behavior, to learn what not to do and to find all the hidden mysteries locked in the twisted histories laid out in these stories.

To see why we go to such lengths to allow ourselves to be manipulated and divided, and to find who is behind it.


"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

154 Posts / 14M
     :   18yrs   :  
zachfrenzel

I don't agree completely ironwood relgion as a hole has bennifts we must have some sort of median for people who need moral guilding to get help through.

Similar to what you said although i didn't untill a couple days ago beleave that most relgion was bad i did beleave that it was a way for the week to hide behind figure heads inorder to avaid thinking for themselfs.

That being said relgions like buddism that are more based on the power of man not on a higher being offer people morals and a door to indepentant thought process.

The same friend i talked about above told me about a relgion in passing that practics a philphoy that you might be interested in. The idea behind this relgion is total belief in one thought. That thought being that man can accomplish anything. That man is the ruling power of the universe and that man as a hole can accomplish anything.

I don't buy into this and i think self-accualtion (i hope i spelled that right) is the answer. I tend to lean towards the philophy that a soicty without relgion is 1 to good to be true and 2 would tend to cause havic.

and zyphon i hardly praise myself and i understand what your saying but self-praise is somthing that must be done. When one reconizes somthing and they know it to be true then they can say it and you got plenty to offer you just have to figure out what that is and work to obtain stautes and improve at it.

On the same key your correct i think by saying that he knows he's smatter then my friend based on one interpretion of somone else's writing is a little out there Just like I know i'm smarter then most people i meet i know there are people that are smarter then me. lol thats why i like this site.

Dercius you proved that you are smarter then me but you never proved my freind wrong. I mean he understood what i beleaved and told me how to answer you without being wrong about what he said. He simply stayted that some relgions are selfish and if one were to sacrofice some beleifs in them then for others then it could fit into a soicty. He accually probley agree's with you but knew he would've lost me if he had agree. Not too stupid if you ask me.


"Be careful what you pretend to be because you are what you pretend to be. So it goes. - Vonnegut"

3968 Posts / 49M
     :   31yrs   :  
Ironwood

quote:
I don't agree completely ironwood relgion as a hole has bennifts we must have some sort of median for people who need moral guilding to get help through.


Name one thing religion has ever accomplished that cannot be accomplished without it...

Moral guiding is the responsibility of society, parents, individuals, not religion. Morals are independant of religion.

What guides one's moral's, religion, or the people who follow these morals and religions?

It is each individual person, and in a society, the individuals coming together to work as a whole, not being seperated by religions.

Don't you see, all these are but borders dividing us. Lies that confuse us, each religion assumes and declares and demands it's truth is the truth, the truth is, it isn't.

Truth is independant of religion too. Every sensible thing found in religion is.

Religion just tries to lay claim to it so it can lay claim to you in your search for it.

quote:
That being said relgions like buddism that are more based on the power of man not on a higher being offer people morals and a door to indepentant thought process.


Again, there is no reason to throw away years of study into spirituality, but it has nothing to do with religion, these things are seperate and only appear the same or connected through years of brainwashing saying it is so.

If they telll you their way is the only path to enlightenment/heaven, then there is no difference.

If they but offer guidance, this is altogether different, and it is not a religion, but a school.

Belief in anything is to be attained by you, even belief in yourself, no one can give it to, or force it upon you.

But they can guide you.

quote:
soicty without relgion is 1 to good to be true and 2 would tend to cause havic.


1. Based on a conditioned frame of mind, had you not been indocrinated in a society so rabidly dependant upon it this would not even come up because then you would more clearly see...

2. Most social havoc is caused by religion. Most prejudices against race, religion, sex, science, free thought, entertainment, and general advacement in society and self is either sourced in religion or exacerbated by it.

Most of the rest of the havoc is caused by the same design, abuses of posistions of authority, like religion, forcing people to rebell against them because they have to fight to survive free of oppression and manipulation.

Unfortunately, so many are so dumbed down and frightened to think for themselves that the only force that can right such abuse, the masses, are asleep.

I don't know about you, but the first time I heard that if I believe or act out of line with these factions that I was going to burn for eternity, I took it as a serious threat.


"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

154 Posts / 14M
     :   18yrs   :  
zachfrenzel

i think where we might differ is are defining of the word relgion.

quote
"If they but offer guidance, this is altogether different, and it is not a religion, but a school."

i would tend to think of it a little differently i took this deffintion from wikipeida
-A religion is a set of beliefs and practices, often centered upon specific supernatural and moral claims about reality, the cosmos, and human nature, and often codified as prayer, ritual, and religious law.

Now if one were to take out everything after often (I kept it in there so one could view it all) then you might be able to understand where i'm coming from.

I beleave that you are correct in everything you said ironwood about morals should be taught by parents and other important people in that persons life.

But if that system fails which it can quite easly then one would have to turn to somthing else in my mind by the deffintion above it would be a religous astplishment that would teach one morals importent to one's soicty while (if i interpreded you correctly) you would define that as a school so maybe thats where we disagree not over over the propuse of these school or relgous esablishments.

lmao the 1st point i meant as kind of a passing joke (wasn't funny) and the 2nd i still stand by people without morals tend to do things that can disrupt a soicty.


"Be careful what you pretend to be because you are what you pretend to be. So it goes. - Vonnegut"

3968 Posts / 49M
     :   31yrs   :  
Ironwood

quote:
Now if one were to take out everything after often


No, all of it, it is set beliefs based on "claims" that are demanded to be faithfully believed about all of reality that is the most important part, the rituals and laws are just what enforce those beliefs.

quote:
the deffintion above it would be a religous astplishment that would teach one morals importent to one's soicty while (if i interpreded you correctly) you would define that as a school


Yes and no, school was more of a random analogy, the difference between a teaching and guiding establishment and a church or religion, is that the latter two are about indoctrination and closing minds, not openning them.

They don't teach, they make claims and force you to believe them, big difference.

quote:
But if that system fails which it can quite easly then one would have to turn to somthing else


What don't you get about who runs religions as well as teaches morals? They are the same people, the religion is irrelevant. If people don't figure it out with or without guidance than they are handled should they choose to break the golden rule.

This is what we call common sense.

Society is already designed to handle these people. We all have the physical freedom to do harm if we wish, but then those around you have the right to defend themselves or retaliate.

That is why it is OUR responsibility as individuals and as part of society to be ever vigilant of the mistreatment of others or posistions of authority.

Common sense is called common for a reason.

Teaching morals doesn't make people follow them, they either choose to or they don't, no religion will change that.

And as a matter of fact, people's overfaithful trust in religion and its figures often protect both religions and its patrons from prosecution of their crimes.

Because they are too scared to do anything, kids get raped, people give their life savings to evangelical whores, evil politicians are seen as pious and just because they claim to be faithful.

Its fucking garbage and its eating our brains.

There is no one else to turn to but ourselves, we are the people, the church, the schools, the police, the government, you need to understand that.

But these things fail, "who can we turn to", and that is why they fail.


"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

154 Posts / 14M
     :   18yrs   :  
zachfrenzel

Ironwood all i'm merely saying is that not EVERYONE is blessed with a more then average IQ and like most people that belong to this site.

Not everyone can grasp consepts that people discuss here and to beleave that if you left it in the hands of people that it would all work out is insane.

There is a reason why relgion has appeared all across the world and that every soicity acrosss the world as of 50 years ago practiced some sort of orginzed relgion.

I agree that modern relgion is bad ecspeically what we practice in the united staes. But to discredit it as a hole is a little out there.

quote,

quote:
all of it, it is set beliefs based on "claims" that are demanded to be faithfully believed about all of reality that is the most important part, the rituals and laws are just what enforce those beliefs.


-A religion is a set of beliefs and practices as defined by wiki

You just discredited a deffintion that is a persnal thought of your's totally missed what i was saying.

You are thinking about relgion in a sense that relgion is always based on following. If you accually look at that deffention all it merely says is basically how you live your life. What you beleave in and how you exucute them.

This means if you were totally anit-relgion you would have to be anit-thought and action which is why i hate modern relgion. That is that it elimates thought.

Relgions can be conseved that would do nothing but help one realize who they are and what they beleave and how they need to use those beliefs to interact with soicty.

If you responce to this point is that they would be indocternated with there teachers beliefs then i would say do u still beleave in what your parent told you growing up.


"Be careful what you pretend to be because you are what you pretend to be. So it goes. - Vonnegut"

3968 Posts / 49M
     :   31yrs   :  
Ironwood

quote:
You are thinking about relgion in a sense that relgion is always based on following. If you accually look at that deffention all it merely says is basically how you live your life. What you beleave in and how you exucute them.


Yes, I was referring to current mainstream organised religion, the ones that hold the rest of the wiki definition, not personal belief systems.

This was not clarified because, due to my general distaste for the word religion based on my own experiences, I don't think of my own personal belief system as one, not that I have an overly defined one anyway.

The part that was confusing me about your argument, which was not clarifying this distinction either, was that you still continue to say that masses of people need to be guided by religion, if you meant their own personal religion, then it is in their hands as you state would be so devastating, if not, then it would be in the hands of organised religion which my argument was about in the first place, referencing what it does to people's ability to think and believe for themselves, fundamentally at odds with the "their own personal religion" definition.


"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

154 Posts / 14M
     :   18yrs   :  
zachfrenzel

Ok let me startout by saying that i'm really bad at communicating thoughts so yes ironwood that was poorly writen i'm trying my hardest to convay what i think.

quote

quote:
you still continue to say that masses of people need to be guided by religion, if you meant their own personal religion, then it is in their hands as you state would be so devastating


umm yes that is what i meant not to say i am correct. To clarify i don't mean everyone runnning their own relgion i mean everyone running their thoughts. That by creating a set of idea's that they (the person) beleave in that they can change at anytime would allow that person to think indepednatly of what everyone else thinks.

This is somthing i beleave in mostly because i hold it to be true in my life. But i'm open to hearing what you think should be done when thought takes over orignised mass relgion.


"Be careful what you pretend to be because you are what you pretend to be. So it goes. - Vonnegut"

320 Posts / 27M
     :   37yrs   :  
Chained Wings

Zach, I believe what Ironwood is trying to say, is people can still be good without a universal lawbook to make them. They don't need the fear of being punished when they die to make them care for each other or be moral. Moreso, they are more likely to be good if they are free of ancient ideals created during a much more primitive and barbaric time.

Humans are capable of using common sense, logic, reasoning, empathy, and other humane attributes which they are born with to learn how to be good to one another and make a better world.

Look at the Mafia. They are some of the most religious people there are. But they not only do criminal things, they also do immoral and inhumane things. Then they go and pray for penance, and feel because they have paid lip service by acting out the ritual prescribed by their particular religion, they cannot be punished by God for anything they do.

And then look at somebody who is nice by nature who is also religious. They may never harm a fly and live the most selfless and productive lives anyone ever could.

According to religion, both of those people will go to heaven. This is wrong.

Religion does not care whether people are good or bad, so long as they acknowledge it as superior. It is not based on doing right or being a good person. But on using mans fear of death; whether there is an afterlife; and the idea of guilt and being watched by "Big Brother" when the powers that be cant be around to keep you in line.

People are good or bad regardless of whether they believe in God, Allah, Yahweh, Buddha or the Flying Spaghetti Monster.

If there was no religion Zach, there would still be good people and bad people. Its just that there would be less divisiveness, and no primitive ways of thinking holding humanity back from being the best it can be.


"When I was a child I flew! Then as an adult- I watched others soar."

All These F***ing Jews
A1F1T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10T11T12T13T14T15T16