Articles | Forums | Polls | Quotes | Who's Online | Store
Signup | Lost Password
"Discontentment is the first step towards change." - St. Jimmy
Main -> Social Awareness -> Politics and Current Events  | NewPosts

Official Captain Cynic WTC 9/11 Thread

USER THREAD
SITE ADMIN
2810 Posts / 89M
     :   28yrs   :  
Decius

Official Captain Cynic WTC 9/11 Thread [+ favourites]

I am creating this thread to explore all the factual evidence there is in regards to the actual nature of demolition and the manner in which buildings fell in NY. I am trying to determine if the buildings fell in a way that is consistent with the explanation we have, which is that jet fuel weakened the steel beams and caused it to collapse. At this juncture I am not bound in any one direction, although I feel it is likely that the manner in which the buildings collapsed was a controlled demolition, solely by the nature of their collapse.

I am interested in this information because I feel extremely emotionally heightened whenever I see a video of the collapse and wonder what it must have been like in those huge buildings at those last moments. I wonder what it must have been like to be in the window that got hit by the plane, and I wonder what goes on in the minds of the families of the victims.

I feel it is necessary to know what happened there to adequately give peace to those that have suffered as a result of it.


"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

SITE ADMIN
2810 Posts / 89M
     :   28yrs   :  
Decius

This is a recently released and never before viewed version of the view of what happened. It is cut in certain places and so certain parts are not visible. I would encourage you to see this first, in its entirety, to get into the right frame of mind.




"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

SITE ADMIN
2810 Posts / 89M
     :   28yrs   :  
Decius

This is a video that outlines the official story.

*Note, I cannot locate a video online that does this. If anyone has any such links please MSG them to me so that I can provide that here.


"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

SITE ADMIN
2810 Posts / 89M
     :   28yrs   :  
Decius

This is a full length video that focusses on the demolition of the buildings and addresses factually the official story and how that relates to actual demolition.

Although apparently made by a republican conservative, it does lean towards the left. Nevertheless, the information itself is what we are focussing on.

It is also important to note that this is a recently released video and is held by most as one of the most factual and well documented documentaries examining the collapse of the 9/11 buildings there is. It is available on DVD as well.




"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

SITE ADMIN
2810 Posts / 89M
     :   28yrs   :  
Decius

Actual firefighters speaking casually about what they saw on 9/11




"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

SITE ADMIN
2810 Posts / 89M
     :   28yrs   :  
Decius

Information I have gathered thus far:

  • In close range video tapings of the WTC building collapses there is a large thunderous sound heard an instant before the building begins to collapse. Since sound travels much slower than light the visual representation of the building collapsing should not only not be at the same time as the sound, but precede it.

  • The WTC was actually created with the purpose of withstanding a 707 airplane crash. This is because an army plane crashed into the Empire State building prior to it being built. The planes that crashed into the WTC were 767s. Although they were bigger, the developers of the WTC claim that it would have withstood multiple 707 crashes.

  • Prior to the WTC, there had been numerous long term (20 hours +) fires in highrise steel buildings. Prior to the WTC, there had been no recorded collapse the result of the fire.

  • Very recently they found miniature human bone fragments on top of a neighbouring building. It is unexplained as to how miniature human bone fragments got there from the WTC or how they could possibly have been as small as they were.

  • The speed at which the buildings collapsed in all recorded videos indicates difinitively that the explanation for the lower floors' collapse is invalid. This is because the buildings collapsed at a "free fall" speed. This means that the upper debris met no resistance as it fell. Additionally, much of the debris was still falling as the lower floors buckled. This makes it less and less probable that the explanation stating that the weight of the upper floors collapsed the bottom ones is accurate. The WTC collapsed in approximately 9 seconds. Using simple physics and air resistance, it is found that a billiard ball dropped from the top of the WTC would take 9 seconds to fall. Using computer estimates and taking into account the resistance of every floor, the WTC would have taken approximately 90 seconds to collapse if it was buckling under the weight of higher floors. This is ten times longer than it took.

  • Similar to the bone fragments, large metal beams (some as large as the airplanes themselves) were flung in various directions and actually lodged into other buildings. There is no explanation for this phenomenon.

  • There are clear explosions extremely similar to planned demolition explosions that can be visibly seen in almost all WTC videos. These visible explosions ejected debris horizontally in the air 2-10 floors below the collapsing floor.


    "Hating everyone protects me from elitism."
    [  Edited by Decius at   ]

  • SITE ADMIN
    2810 Posts / 89M
         :   28yrs   :  
    Decius

    Inspired by the film "9/11 Mysteries"

    Respect the Dead - World Trade Center

    Respect the Dead - WTC


    "Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

    1764 Posts / 62M
         :   56yrs   :  
    cturtle

    quote:
    Similar to the bone fragments, large metal beams (some as large as the airplanes themselves) were flung in various directions and actually lodged into other buildings. There is no explanation for this phenomenon.

    Compressional forces being suddenly released could cause the steel beams to be projected especially considering the outer walls being sheared as floor sections fell toward the ground floor. The time factor is another story as the collaspe of floors would have taken longer than free-fall, one possibility is that the center section (around the elevator shafts) decent was shrouded by the smoke & the exterior of the building till lower floors structural failure resulting in the sudden building collaspe.


    "Terrorist or tyrant, few may come to the Truth that both are poor choice."

    2193 Posts / 62M
         :   49yrs   :  
    okcitykid

    I have been arguing this in another forum. A religious right wing forum, all they could do was insult me but could not explain how two airplanes could take down three buildings at free fall speeds on top of their own foot prints.

    The argument is that the jet fuel started a fire hot enough to weaken the steal frame causing a floor to collapse, thus creating a pancake effect causing the buildings to fall straight down. This not only happened once, but three times.

    Bombs and airplanes have hit buildings in the past, however, no where in history has this ever happened before. And still, this does not explain how the buildings fell straight down or at free fall speeds. This theory is so stupid that no one dare put their name on it, so the official line reads, "experts say."

    One expert and others supporting him are not afraid to give their name.

    http://scholarsfortruth.org/


    Dr. Steven E. Jones, Physicist and Archaeometrist recently retired from BYO for his controversial ideas.

    quote:

    1. Email to Prof Jones from a structural engineer in Texas:

    "It occurred to me that structural engineers and architects are practitioners of static physics [like yourself] although we use different terminology peculiar to our professions to elaborate on our designs.

    I am surprised how few of my colleagues have expressed public disbelief at the official line which lurches from theory to theory as the shortcomings of each became apparent. I guess they have run out of ideas on Building 7.

    You nailed the biggest problem when you focused on the symmetry of collapse in comparison to the asymmetry of the damage... Steel high rises are designed (and overdesigned) as cantilever beams on end. There is so much redundant steel in these buildings because they have to resist hurricane force winds. Was there a hurricane in New York on Sept 11?

    If steel framed structures designed by world class engineers (who are still being commissioned to design high rises elsewhere in the world) can collapse with so little provocation, I should send my diploma back and take up fortune telling.

    So astute that the president promptly declared 9/11 an Act of War (the truth, sort of). This relieved the designers of having to defend themselves for negligent design. No professional liability policies cover war (because of exposure to explosives etc.), so no deep pockets to make a lawsuit worth while. So no engineer singing to a jury…"




    Mr. Jones explains the explosions many heard just before the buildings collapsed and the molten steal found weeks afterwards, the official explanation doesn't.


    "A fool says I know and a wise man says I wonder."

    110 Posts / 22M
         :   28yrs   :  
    Wayback

    quote:
    Compressional forces being suddenly released could cause the steel beams to be projected especially considering the outer walls being sheared as floor sections fell toward the ground floor.
    Ascribing the fundelmental balistic may be of value? As the airplanes crashed into the building at levels higher than the surrounding buildings, where wre the locations of these beams & at what angle did they penetrate the building(s)could provide valuable insight.
    quote:
    The time factor is another story as the collaspe of floors would have taken longer than free-fall, one possibility is that the center section (around the elevator shafts) decent was shrouded by the smoke & the exterior of the building till lower floors structural failure resulting in the sudden building collaspe.
    Assuming that the upper levels fell in tack into the lower floors doesn't imply that set charges were not used to structurally weaken the buildings or that these monliths of the Modern World are not designed to fall in rather than fall over?


    110 Posts / 22M
         :   28yrs   :  
    Wayback

    In the video linked by OkCityKid there was a bright flash & what appeared as flames so it did look to be an explosion of some sort? In the first video, Ialso noted a thick cloud of smoke rising from the area below the near roof line in front of the tower. It is more than evidence to see that something happen before the tower fell but it would be hard to prove anything.The metal beams which struck other buildings, did they strike the walls of the building near the towers or were they near the roofs?


    Official Captain Cynic WTC 9/11 Thread
    A1F1T0T1T2T3T4T5T6T7T8T9T10T11T12T13T14T15T16