| 
Ancient: The two flaws in your logic are: 1. That in helping people improve themselves we are negating love. 2. That helping someone is "thinking less of" them. By your rational, a parent teaching a child how to walk or swim or read is making the child feel small, and is the opposite of love. Furthermore, although your gf may believe that criticism is indicative of someone thinking less of her, this is purely the result of insecurity. Everyone will meet people who know more or have experienced more than them, and they can always educate themselves, ie learn, ie fix themselves in a more improved manner in using this information. If learning is a good thing, then, the easier it is for one to acquire this information the better it is for them. So, if you make it easy for someone to acquire your expertise, then you are, in fact, loving them. You should inform your gf that the acceptance of mediocrity is not the same as love, unless that mediocrity can never be improved. An example of this would be loving a retard. So to use all of this to explain ME, would I treat a retard the same way I would you or awakend? Nope. Because a retard knows no better, and as you said, I'd love him or her just the way he or she is. And the only way anyone else gets that treatment is if they wish to be considered retards. So your gf is in essence saying: "I am not perfect. And whatever flaws I have are the same ones I will have forever because I have reached the peak of my ability to learn. Love me for who I am because this is what I will always be." Or, to paraphrase: "My brain is not like most humans. Mine can actually get full. And I had a finite time available to fill it. And whatever it's been filled with is staying that way. I cannot change that." And if that is the case, good luck with that relationship.
"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."
|