| 
Well argued.
The question of course would eventually break down when we ask how did they know of the wheel? Go further, further nd further still, and the human mind starts to find trouble. Are there any coincidences?
Its rather strange isn't it how we humans think.
If I could imagine the world as it probably is beyond the perception I would liken it to a perfect flow. The human mind, the human eye, any human receptor is limited. Thus we will constantly wish for and actually find originality.
In physics have you ever done the experiment where you flash a flash light at a stream of water and watch it periodically go dark and light?
This practice is what we do. Its like if you grow up with your own kids you never notice them looking different. But an aunt who hasn't seen them for a year will notice the difference.
So it is with originality; its just how big we think the event is. The perception is seeing the event as big, small, relevant, irrelavant, etc. but more importantly how we can fix this in with what else we know or our abilities, both of which may be argued to be a collection of prejudices!
Of course whether the underlying law is learned is of course what scientists wish to hope to collectively find when seeking 'the truth'. The question is whether this truth is really what is worth looking for. Fortunately, I say 'yes it is!' at least its on the right track.
""No words""
|
