Bible: Fiction or Non-Fiction

yes and for sure i want to see read both sides.. caseu like i said what makes me convinced is the book by a historina CHRISTIAN who concluded jesus proba ly did not exist.. (was found in many other religions etc etc the other main points).. he was on the radio.. i wish i wrote dowe his name,.., but ill research and find out.. and also read /hear both siedes.. for my own curiosity... you too reserach

(woops wnated smiley face to appear after 'you too reseacrh'..

"no quote until i copyright it.."

"the chrtians response ... (like patrish)... is to ignore it" said by some famous guy concerning the jesus is myth.. i checked the arguments.. ill chek more but so far it looks like you (patrish) are closed thinker... at least as i would show but probably more close monded cause you didint even read that side your one of them who ignores it you cant handlr it why are you so defensive about it!!???.. becasue you want jesus you cant ecept that hgnoy exitng re.. my desire tmrhgkn

"no quote until i copyright it.."

we studied the bible in my mythology class last year. it was right betweent the norse mythology and the mesopotamian mythology sections. hehe i thought that was funny.

"I had the right to remain silent but I did not have the ability."

for real..

"no quote until i copyright it.."

Well regardless on how much proof there is about the fact that Jesus roamed the Earth it still doesn't define the fact that he was the son of God. Its quite possible that he was just crazy and really thought he was the son of God. Throw in a few magic tricks here and there and no one's the wiser especially two thousand years ago. Anyone can say their the son of God but there's no real proof linking Jesus and being the son of God other than him saying so or being told in stories. The stories were written a hundred years later after Jesus' death which means that the only way they could have been passed down is through word. People change miss out parts over exaggerate etc. They also worshipped the guy don't you think if they worshipped him they would be a little bias to his actual greatness. All logical sense points towards a hoax.

But that's not to say that he didn't have good teachings. Which brings back the question of where to place it. Because although the stories are most likely not accurate they still represent a good moral background. I guess you could say it's a fable.

"I love to see people struggling for their purpose in life..."

I don't think the science can proof or explain all the phenomens happend on the earth! (sorry for the eror!)