| 
Decious, the problem is an ineefective form of communication. Things such as spirituality cannot be plainly stated in words, as by their nature they are not to be understood by the intellectual mind, and so they can easily be misinterpreted. The Buddha realized this and didn't rely heavily on language, as He knew it's limitation and flaws. But the problem with Buddhisim is, that it is not a practical religion. I would love to know how many people out there would like to let go of all their material comforts, for a thing they do not even fully understand, as 'love' and 'respect' are not even a scratch on the surface of Buddhisim. Oh, and no, Buddhisim infact does have a concept of heaven and hell, but not in a literall sense, it doesn't speak about fires and rotten flesh etc.. Ideally, there really should be no religion, but ofcourse the argument is if therz no religion, there will be chaos. But one question: will as many people have died and suffered if there was no religion to guide man?
"I'll heal ur woundz I'll set u free, I m jesus christ on xtacy"
|