Intelligence and value

Intelligence and value [+ favourites]

Strange thread for a religious forum?

This is between people. I have to pick one first. Ok here goes general perception:

1. The *supposed* intellect bashes the *supposed* religious person using the notion that its just belief without proof essentially. In many respects the argument seems to go with that its belief in something which is unlikely. Indeed if you sat in a court of law and said God made me do it...you are unlikely to get away with it unless you are termed mentally ill.

2. *supposed* religious person argues against this person on the grounds that essentially they are closing their minds to what they see as reality. Where do they get their motives? who teaches you your motives? Where do your values in judgement come from? what drives you to do things? And religious people may call this God or spirit.

Now I will stab both of these people. The truth is in both cases noone knows.

In the first case I'm going to stab historians in the sense that only recently have they 'discovered' that history is really just history of historical evidence...not of reality (no s**t Sherlock!). Plus the 'supposed' religious people have very good points...If we were not educated rethically we would behave like animals and I'm sure this computer you see would not be here.

In the second case I'm going to say the first case has grounds in that you should reasonably judge things on balance of evidence and the possibility of occurenece, albeit vague.

The general point is that most of us are normally human, that is we don't have the minds of the great people who, despite their tendencies to follow each route, actually at heart have values and intellect and so it appears sound judgement. there is a clear difference between educated and intelligent! In any case I think we may be dawning on a new religious front where tradionalists will be seperated from radicalists in much the same way as science was seen as religious heracy.

Lets stop this and recognise

a) Humans need to feel good. Why criticise the percieved stupidity of them? Would you kill a rat just because it is stupid? If you would then you prove my point of intellect without value.

b) We are facing problems all the time. If we don't stop ensuing technology and using intellectual strength to find cures to problems like pollution or epidemics/pandemics then there is more chance our species will die.

""No words""

if i understand what your saying, i agree with you. ethical values do not need a religous standpoint to come from. most ethical values are just the logical basic rules needed for humaqns to peacefully co-habit in large groups. other wise we would be like animals, though often some animals display such ethical values. most do not kill each other, they share rather than steal from each other. so what we call ethics is more or less common sense.

in what i see as a summary of heyjme's last two points, neither religion nor technology are society, they are both just parts of it. for our society to work they must coexist peacefully

"So Schrodinger's Cat is not only neither dead nor alive, but might also be sexually aroused by elbows and peanut butter?"

quote:

---

other wise we would be like animals, though often some animals display such ethical values. most do not kill each other, they share rather than steal from each other. so what we call ethics is more or less common sense.

---

""No words""

as far as i can see there is almost no way that humans are ever going to completely overcome the urge to respect and protect them and theirs more than any other person. the only way i can see of doing that is through a fundemental change in the way the human mind operates, which could only happen through either some strange evolutionary twist, or through some advanced genetic engineering, though that form of genetic engineering would not be allowed to be researched, as it would potentially allow people to be turned into drones such as the clone army in star wars.

"So Schrodinger's Cat is not only neither dead nor alive, but might also be sexually aroused by elbows and peanut butter?"

Yeah...My level of stupidity is now dawning on me....Time to go play.

""No words""

your by no means stupid. for all we know, u may be right and i may be wrong. we are both purely stating our opinions, mine jsut happens to be that it is a bit idealistic to expect humans to completely overcome their nature and accept everyone as an equal, i try hard to, but i know i dont succeed.

"So Schrodinger's Cat is not only neither dead nor alive, but might also be sexually aroused by elbows and peanut butter?"