| 
I am quite aware of the definition of secular thank you. In the case of a government, secular indicate that its policies and agendas do not support any one religion at all, as opposed to a state sponsored religion, which has occurred. And once again, the Declaration has NO bearing on the laws of this land. I would like you to explain then the “Tripoli Treaty”, Article 11, which was written and signed by the same men who founded this country. There is simply no way to “twist” the meaning of “As the Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion-…”
-------------------------------------
“How about the lives of more American children..or women...or innocent civilians??”
So the Iraqi citizens were responsible for the 9/11 attacks? Have we killed enough Iraqi’s to satisfy your bloodlust? Is this part of that whole “eye for an eye” idiom? Oh wait, they are heathens and heretics, so it doesn’t really matter if they die. Sure, Saddam, who was on his way out anyways, would have been pissed if we managed to locate some training bases in his country, then bomb those bases into oblivion. But many would have thought that much more appropriate, instead of involving those innocents you seem to have forgotten. In my opinion, such a surgical strike would have sent a clear message to terrorists. One that states, “No matter where you hide, we will find you.” It would also have cost no American Soldiers, or non-combatant, their lives. This would also have not caused insurgents to “defend their country” from the US invasion.
-------------------------------------
“THINK about it....do YOU care about what the good has been done by taking down a tyrant… YOU ignore the peace this action has created as an end result for the MAJORITY.”
The end does not always justify the means, the deaths of innocent Iraqi women and children, and the deaths of our sons and daughters, caused by our militaristic interference simply cannot justify our take over of that country. Again, the United States has No Right interfering with a sovereign nation. What about the genocides, slavery, and starvation in other countries, are we supposed to go into those countries as well and take over? And I see the original intent of this invasion has been lost, what ever happened to the WMD that supposedly supported and motivated the President’s war agenda in the first place, you know, the WMD we never found?
-------------------------------------
“The only ppl you listen to are EXTREMISTS...WHO ARE FILLED WITH HATE TO BEGIN WITH.”
One should not cast stones in a glass house. You forward the agenda of people you yourself have called Extremists. Merely terming them, and yourself, “filled with the love of God” does not negate the evils of the hate filled doctrines they, and you, would have this country enslaved under. Islamic Extremists justify themselves in the same manner that you do dear, only in a different language and dedicated to a different God, perhaps you should examine closely your own motivations. Their motivations are simple enough, they feel threatened by Fundamental Christianity, and at the moment in their views, the US embodies that mindset.
"Oops, it appears I have run over your dogma with my karma."
|
{Which could be a sign from God as well...since Kurds are at a majority Christian} 
