Stricter guidelines for topical forums

nope, still perfectly in line with the topic, we are discussing stricter guidelines, and restless is telling you that there is a handy location that no light from our nearest star illuminates where you can place any complaints you have about decius management style .

"I tried coding in cocoa but it ran between the keys and shorted my pc"

bow down before the great admins!!!'

this is ridicules, if people are expressing, based on their opinions, how can decius use his own opinion to rule the posters opinion invalid? i think chrisD is right about making a subtle difference in an irrelevant post. and decius, your argument about rating posts, to me, is invalid. You are rating posts when you delete them. so in turn your doing the same thing. so why cant this be simple, i think you should just make a subtle difference on irrelevant posts, then we can all enjoy the humor and humiliation of having an irrelevant post.

plus please drop the whole big brother spiel. this is horribly uncool.

ps. love the site!

"if life has no point whats the point in talking about it?"

Thanks for your irrelevant feedback in a thread a year and a half-old, arguing against the success wrought by the very points brought up in the thread by myself. Do you know how much administration I've had to do since I implemented stricted guidelines? Less than before.

Now, go express your anti-establishment-yet-absolutely-conformist-anti-conformist views elsewhere, you confused minion.

Actually, in all honesty I didn't read your post too thoroughly or register your complaint because I'm pretty sure you're wrong and I'm right. But if you do feel really passionate about it, read the thread thoroughly, respectfully try to understand and in fact defend my point, then message me privately if you still think you have a logical point. If, at that point, I don't respond, start the process all over again because you clearly didn't do it right the first time.

"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

exactly my point.

this is not the actions of one who believes in listening to every ones opinion and having a forum meant for "easy" exchange and gaining of knowledge. just a bit close minded. but now that i know this is all implemented and im not really even effected then i dont really care so, enjoy having an ego, that you didnt put aside.

"if life has no point whats the point in talking about it?"

You just admitted (in another thread) you get intimidated (and, presumably, this creates a contest in you, incorrectly) and still choose to engage in a contest with me. Are you humble enough to accept the possibility that I know your sub-conscious better than you do?

I mean, my reaction to your initial post was based on my instinct telling me that you are competitive, and therefore, a verbal masturbator (at times). It's not my job to read thoroughly your ejaculate and try to make sense of it. Do you have any idea how many times I've heard people tell me I have an ego because I don't acknowledge the shit they say that they themselves don't even believe?

Humility my friend. It is your friend if you wish to be friends with knowledge. I left it open for you to knowledgeably and amicably discuss the matter with me... what did you do with my offer?

Masturbate.

"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."

oh god. that is rather snakish to use that kind of reasoning. there was a point to my initial argument. but its now invalidated due to my admittance of masturbation. thats a loss. you win.

"if life has no point whats the point in talking about it?"