It has to start somewhere.

It has to start somewhere. [+ favourites]

ALL HELL! CANT STOP US NOW!

alright, what do you people think about the debates only including the two main party candidates? bullshit to me. i don't see how we can call them debates even. we should call them press conferences. thats all they are. they get asked a question, and they either:

A. BS them
B. Answer them
C. Use some sly one-liner
D. Stumble and mumble about freedom fries

Do you think the 'debates' should have all the candidates? Including the pimp Badnarik, Cobb, and Nader. And should said 'debates' even be regarded as debates when direct questions toward one another isn't...alowed? we're being shafted, people. and its not right.

Oh the shaft is long and hard my friend, we've been getting it for a while, we can't even see the begginings anymore.

"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

mmmmmmm, green/lib debates:


https://www.freemarketnews.com/portfolio/talkradioetv.php

I didnt feel the debate was fair.

I believe they should be debating one another...
2 minutes then 90 seconds.

There is alot we wont know because of the limited time.

"Life is full of lemons, and the lemonade is sweet."

pat, your are probably right, but debates aren't appearantly concerned with honesty either, because that would bring out honest reactions and natures, they spend too much time memorizing stuff for that. It is a press conference, it is just more of the same, an extension of theire campaigns, its freaking rediculous is what it is, but its what most voters finish making up their minds with.

"The Greatest Enemy of Knowledge is Not Ignorance, It is the ILLUSION of Knowledge. Stephen Hawking"

I don't like that debate format... This last debate was nothign more than a repeat of the previous; boring!

"Life, Liberty, & Property Rights."