| 
Okcitykid> You should not take offense to what I have stated because the fallacy in your thinking is that you are somehow related to BMX because he is a soldier, and you were one. I have debated BMX in the past (which influences my responses here) and he has demonstrated little to no understanding of this war, and constantly flaunts this "gung-ho" pro-army mentality. This is why I call him a baby killer, because such unaware behaviour is extremely dangerous when you are permitted to carry a gun. I am man enough to appologize (and have done so to numerous members of this site), but do not feel obligated to pacify the feelings of someone who now carries a gun meant to kill people and has little to no understanding of why he is carrying it. Furthermore, i am not aware if you were conscripted or not when you served, but I would never call a soldier a baby killer, or any other foul mouthed phrase unless I knew the nature of their mentality. I have at least three friends online who have served and an ex-marine who is a friend of mine in town, and do not criticize them for their actions, because they seek to be aware. Dug> As do I. Normandy had nothing to do with Iraq. DT> "he should have done that before joining" - Agreed. Since the war is shit and the orders come from higher up, and the higher ups are shit, volunteering to tote a gun around in Iraq means you choose to kill for the wrong reasons. OR... you did not have enough information. Either way, you should not be carrying a gun in Iraq. If you do not know why you are there, or believe you are there for the wrong reasons, you are a hired thug. The day and age when soldiers were revered for their valiant courage died with Vietnam, when faith in the politicians was shattered. Now, you must go in with all eyes open, aware of the government that is sending you to kill. If you do not, (which BMX obviously hasn't... because he's there), you are a threat to every person around you, including civilians, including babies.
"Hating everyone protects me from elitism."
|