| 
lol, I know I do. If we determin what a pro or a con is, then the truth is relative. While my brain strides to argue for free will, while yours is against it is a matter of different pros. And in such, different truths. I thought earlier about being amused, and the will of a man to become amused by something. How does a man come to enjoy something that he does not need if he is controlled by chemicals in his mind? If it is from adaption of his milieu, then where did the first man come up with being amused by something he did not need. If free will was being controlled by the chemicals in our brains, I believe we would be no farther along then the ants in the ground. It is because of our free will that we are as advanced as we are, and that we have such entertainments and all. Now think of the possibilities of a choice. Each choice has a cause and effect thingy going on, right? If the mind was able to calculate every pro and con to the situation, man would be ruling the universe right now. We would be gods. But the brain is unable to predict every outcome to the situation of a decision so it must guess at its best. And that guess is free will.
"Fate is the shadow cast by the light of our choice. We can change our fate by altering that light."
|