| Plain stuipid or worthwile?HELP!  [+ favourites]
Hi, I have this theory that I would like to show you. Please tell me if it is worth thinking or is it just my imajination running away.
Well, first of all here's my theory of how God see's the future:
It is common place that the longer a person lives, the shorter time seems to him.Like a hundred year old person would regard a year as quite small compared to a 2 year old. So to God, a year might be the same as one second. However, he hasn't lived for 10 thousand billion years or something, he has lived INFINITELY, so that means that a thousand years might be a really small period compared to a Him, something like 0.0001 seconds or something. However, as he has lived for eternity, an infinite amount of time will seem as 0 seconds to Him, i.e the present. So to God, the future IS the present. He does not 'predict' the future, he 'lives' it.Maybe that is why God has set a law of dying for human kind(in that case, for everything in the universe), for if a man keeps on living, the same thing will happen to him at some point!
Some people may argue that time only SEEMS shorter the longer a person lives, but the fact is that no matter HOW long a perrson lives, time will NEVER seem as 0 seconds to him, as it only applies to someone who has been present for infinite.
Well, thats one theory.
I have another one of what happened before the universe, which is naturally vague:
In a thread, I mentoined that asking what was before the Universe was like asking what happened in a computer before it was invented! I said that there is a 'real' world outside the universe. There are different types of time. The one that exists within our universe makes everything have a beggining and an end:
Begging-------------------------End
However, outside(or before) the universe, time may be nevr ending, no begging, no end: O, like a circle. This also applies to the concept of God.
However, if time keeps on going on like this, that must mean that there must be a infinite amount of time before any event! Which is absurd.
In the 'real' world, life(whatever that may be) will go on. There would not be the presence of any illusion like time. However, if time does not exist in the real world, that must mean that according to our own terminology, time must be still. If time is still then my previous example of time going in a circle is false, as that shows that time keeps on moving. Infact, in the 'real' world, there had been no past, as well as no future. The 'world' will stay as it is. There will only be the present, and so everything will go on, unchanged, unending, with no DEFINATE past.
A example of this is that even in 'our' world, universe whatever, many thousands of pasts may occur during a span of a few years, but very few during an hour. However, as time will be still, everything will infinitely go on, and the one hour is thus reduced to something like 0.00001 seconds, and as in my earlier theory, again to 0 seconds i.e the present.
Please tell me what you think of these two ideasor should they be cut from theory because we can't observe them?
Please let me know what you think, and you can ask me some questions if you have any to test them, or maybe this is all stuipid???????
"I'll heal ur woundz I'll set u free, I m jesus christ on xtacy"
|
